Thread: Balance
View Single Post


Old 05-17-2007
 
#177
United States XBSHX
BF Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,215
 XBSHX is a name known to allXBSHX is a name known to allXBSHX is a name known to allXBSHX is a name known to allXBSHX is a name known to allXBSHX is a name known to allXBSHX is a name known to allXBSHX is a name known to allXBSHX is a name known to allXBSHX is a name known to allXBSHX is a name known to all
Default Re: Balance

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10thNazgul View Post
You forgot that if a feature is going to be added to a game, you could also add something to balance it.
Example: if siege tank could crush small units under its threads (as marines or zerglings) then marines could have rocket upgrade, or could garrison buildings/scenario elements.
Zergling could be able, if you flank the tank, to jump over the tank and overrun it.
NO NO NO garrisoning building.... I hate that aspect of C&C the most... I don't want the same for StarCraft, NO unit crushing either... that is why C&C is always has crappy balance.

Why did this turn into graphics discussion? You can have it 3D without doing anything to the balance. You don't have to make giant circles to turn a seige tank... it has 4 seperate tracks so it would be able to turn in place fairly quickly... reavers might have trouble turning but then again why can't blizzard just make them do a 180 like in the regular SC?
 
XBSHX has 3,215 Posts

Zergling seagull sound NEEDS to go.
 

XBSHX is offline


pm.gif  Send a message via MSN to XBSHX  
Reply With Quote